Two questions:<\/p>\n
Number one:
\nWhere’s Osama bin Laden? Remember him? The guy actually behind the 9-11 strikes?<\/p>\n
Number two:
\nIs anyone else as skeptical as I am of the rush to label any drum of chemicals “possible weapons of mass destruction”? We’re not looking for smoking guns. We’re looking for justifications for what we’ve done. We have the 21st century Salem Witch Trials going on, all on live TV. I have MSNBC on in the background, and they’re reporting that Saddam and his sons may be dead. Well, let’s face it: there’s a 50 percent chance they’re right. If no such chemical weapons, or nuke-u-ler weapons, or anything of the sort is found, what will it mean for the U.S.’s role in the post-conflict world?<\/p>\n
Give me a reason why this war had to happen, and I’ll be satisfied (and saddened). But I haven’t seen anything like it yet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Two questions: Number one: Where’s Osama bin Laden? Remember him? The guy actually behind the 9-11 strikes? Number two: Is anyone else as skeptical as I am of the rush to label any drum of chemicals “possible weapons of mass destruction”? We’re not looking for smoking guns. We’re looking for justifications for what we’ve done. … <\/p>\n